[asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 4599: chan_iax2 - unprotected access of iaxs[peer->callno] potentially results in segfault

Jaco Kroon reviewboard at asterisk.org
Wed Apr 8 06:59:32 CDT 2015


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4599/
-----------------------------------------------------------

(Updated April 8, 2015, 6:59 a.m.)


Status
------

This change has been marked as submitted.


Review request for Asterisk Developers.


Changes
-------

Committed in revision 434291


Bugs: ASTERISK-21211
    https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-21211


Repository: Asterisk


Description
-------

chan_iax2.c, specifically in function iax2_poke_peer, a completely unprotected access to iaxs[peer->callno] is made. Specifically I had a segfault trigger on line 12230, an access to iaxs[peer->callno] - the second in a sequence, so peer->callno can definitely change between the two

It is my understanding that:

1. peer->callno can change outside of the function , thus it's probably unsafe to use the raw value as per lines 12223, 12229 and 12230. I believe this should be callno, and not peer->callno. Please correct me if I'm wrong. This can either happen by us calling iax2_destroy, or simply another thread also scheduling a POKE on the same peer.

2. All reads and writes to iaxs[X] should be protected by a lock of iaxsl[X]. Lines 12229 and 12230 violates this currently.

I suspect my crash resulted from a sequence where a POKE was in process of being scheduled, another thread then called iax2_poke_peer for the same peer, called iax2_destroy on the iaxs[] busy being set up, and boom major catastrophe.


Diffs
-----

  http://svn.asterisk.org/svn/asterisk/trunk/channels/chan_iax2.c 434210 

Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4599/diff/


Testing
-------

Been running since 11.2.1 with this patch, specifically 6/3/2013 (more than two years) in multiple production environments.  Many fewer segfaults.


Thanks,

Jaco Kroon

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20150408/56d2ccb4/attachment.html>


More information about the asterisk-dev mailing list