[asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 4581: build: Fixes for gcc 5 compilation
Matt Jordan
reviewboard at asterisk.org
Mon Apr 6 12:59:39 CDT 2015
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4581/#review15079
-----------------------------------------------------------
Ship it!
The issue below is minor and can be tweaked on commit.
branches/11/main/ccss.c
<https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4581/#comment25758>
Shouldn't this be:
if (sscanf(value, "%30u", &value_ast_uint) != 1) {
...
}
- Matt Jordan
On April 3, 2015, 1:44 p.m., George Joseph wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4581/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated April 3, 2015, 1:44 p.m.)
>
>
> Review request for Asterisk Developers and Scott Griepentrog.
>
>
> Bugs: ASTERISK-24932
> https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-24932
>
>
> Repository: Asterisk
>
>
> Description
> -------
>
> These are fixes for compilation under gcc 5.0...
>
> chan_sip.c: In parse_request needed to make 'lim' unsigned.
> inline_api.h: Needed to add a check for '__GNUC_STDC_INLINE__' to detect C99 inline semantics (same as clang).
> ccss.c: In ast_cc_set_parm, needed to fix weird comparison.
> dsp.c: Needed to work around a possible compiler bug. It was throwing an array-bounds error but neither
> sgriepentrog, rmudgett nor I could figure out why.
> manager.c: In action_atxfer, needed to correct an array allocation.
>
> If I can reproduce the possible gcc bug in a short test case, I'll submit it upstream.
>
> This patch will go to 11, 13, trunk.
>
> Reported-by: Jeffrey Ollie
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> branches/11/main/manager.c 433966
> branches/11/main/dsp.c 433966
> branches/11/main/ccss.c 433966
> branches/11/include/asterisk/inline_api.h 433966
> branches/11/channels/chan_sip.c 433966
>
> Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4581/diff/
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
> Ran unit and testsuite tests. No differences detected.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> George Joseph
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20150406/36635bc1/attachment.html>
More information about the asterisk-dev
mailing list