[asterisk-dev] Opinions Needed: PJSIP Outboud Registration with multiple server_uris

[Joshua Colp]

George Joseph wrote:

<snip>

>
>
> How about we use the pattern approach but compile in patterns for trunk
> and user.  There are lots of minor differences between ITSPs and phones
> and I just worry that in the quest to create something for everyone we
> create something that's useful to no one.

If it does not impact any of the existing code and is easy for a user, 
then sure. That being said... get feedback any way you can before doing 
anything. This is a complicated area.

>
>
>     Given the following (even without documentation) could someone
>     coming from sip.conf understand it?
>
>     [1000]
>     type=phone
>     secret=notverysecret
>     context=trusted
>     disallow=all
>     allow=g722
>     mailbox=1000
>
>     I err on the side of yes. That's what I think is needed. Heck, it's
>     hard enough to get people to realize they can use templates.
>
> I love templates so much that I enhanced manager and config so you read
> and write templates via AMI GetConfig and UpdateConfig.
>
> If we compile in basic patterns it could be as simple as
>
> [1000]
> type = composite                 ; ok, maybe composite and pattern
> aren't good names.
> pattern = phone                  ; built-in pattern
> incoming_password = notverysecret
> context = trusted
> disallow = all
> allow = g722
> mailboxes = 1000
>
>
> Are you OK with a separate config file?  It would make manipulating it
> easier since there'd be no duplicate section names.

Yes.

-- 
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - US
Check us out at: www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org