[asterisk-dev] Opinions Needed: PJSIP Outboud Registration with multiple server_uris
Joshua Colp
jcolp at digium.com
Sat Sep 20 12:21:02 CDT 2014
George Joseph wrote:
<snip>
>
> 5. The idea of higher level concept configuration has been thrown
> around as something to make this easier. I personally think this
> sort of thing belongs there. A type=trunk, itsp, phone, etc. Lower
> level blocks remain the same and additional logic on top can be
> added to handle this sort of thing.
>
> Are you thinking like users.conf? I thought you guys wanted that to die
> a horrible death. :) Seriously though, are you thinking along the
> lines of a new composite pjsip configuration object that creates the
> base objects behind the scenes? If so, that'd solve a lot and I could
> start working on it right now. I just thought you guys were shying away
> from these types of things.
As base objects it's a bad idea. As a single object to rule them all (a
user) it's also a complicated/bad idea. As higher level concepts which
represent things that people are familiar with they're fine.
--
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - US
Check us out at: www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org
More information about the asterisk-dev
mailing list