[asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 4000: res_pjsip_sdp_rtp.c: Fix native formats containing formats that were not negotiated.
Mark Michelson
reviewboard at asterisk.org
Thu Sep 18 17:36:31 CDT 2014
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4000/#review13356
-----------------------------------------------------------
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Mark Michelson
On Sept. 18, 2014, 6:26 p.m., rmudgett wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4000/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated Sept. 18, 2014, 6:26 p.m.)
>
>
> Review request for Asterisk Developers.
>
>
> Bugs: AFS-162
> https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/AFS-162
>
>
> Repository: Asterisk
>
>
> Description
> -------
>
> Outgoing PJSIP calls can result in non-negotiated formats listed in the channel's native formats if video formats are listed in the endpoint's configuration. The resulting call could then use a non-negotiated format resulting in one way audio.
>
> * Simplified the update of session->req_caps in set_caps(). Why do something in five steps when only one is needed?
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> /branches/13/res/res_pjsip_sdp_rtp.c 423446
> /branches/13/channels/chan_pjsip.c 423446
>
> Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4000/diff/
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
> Configured PJSIP endpoints with: allow=!all,h264,g722,h263,ulaw,h263p,alaw
> Called from D40 with g722 among other formats enabled to a Polycom that negotiates ulaw.
> Before the patch, Asterisk would send g722 frames to the Polycom. The resulting call had one way audio because the Polycom does not understand g722.
> After the patch, Asterisk sends ulaw frames to the Polycom.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> rmudgett
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20140918/c30bae3c/attachment.html>
More information about the asterisk-dev
mailing list