[asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 3281: stasis cache: Enhance to keep track of an item from different entities.

[Matt Jordan]

> On March 2, 2014, 11:01 p.m., Matt Jordan wrote:
> > /trunk/include/asterisk/devicestate.h, lines 278-281
> > <https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3281/diff/1/?file=55014#file55014line278>
> >
> >     I'm certainly fine with losing the cache_id, as it is no longer necessary.
> >     
> >     I'm not fan of changing the stringfield to a const char *, simply because it really is non-const, and you have to cast the const char * back to a char * to free it. Generally, if something is const it should always be const; if not, well, it's not.
> >     
> >     Granted, string fields with a single entry a bit goofy, but I think I'd rather go with that goofiness over the const gyrations.
> 
> rmudgett wrote:
>     The device name string is immutable throughout its lifetime.  It is just malloced by ast_strdup() to hold the value.  It is a quirk of the free() function signature that it takes a non-const pointer and thus requires the cast to get rid of the memory.
>     
>     Stringfield strings are declared as const when they are used.  You have to call a function to set a new value.
>     
>     typedef const char * ast_string_field;
>     #define AST_STRING_FIELD(name) const ast_string_field name
>

I still think this makes the semantics of the field more difficult to understand, not less. I would generally not assume I need to free the thing pointed to by a const char *, as the value cannot be modified by my pointer. Your approach seems to violate that intent.

I'm not sure how this change adds any value over the string field approach. With a string field, you would initialize it and set it in the allocation routine. You would de-init the string field in the object's ao2 destructor. That doesn't appear to be any more work than what you have here, and the usage semantics are clear.


- Matt


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3281/#review11018
-----------------------------------------------------------


On March 1, 2014, 7:07 p.m., rmudgett wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3281/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 1, 2014, 7:07 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Asterisk Developers.
> 
> 
> Bugs: ASTERISK-23204
>     https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-23204
> 
> 
> Repository: Asterisk
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> A stasis cache entry now contains more than a single message/snapshot.  It contains messages/snapshots for the internal entity as well as any external entities that post to the cached item.  In addition callbacks can be supplied when the cache is created to compute and post the aggregate message/snapshot representing all entities stored in the cache entry.
> 
> * All stasis messages now have an eid to indicate what entity posted it.
> 
> * The stasis cache enhancements allow device state to cache and aggregate the device states from internal and external entities in a single operation.  The cached aggregate device state is available immediately after it is posted to the stasis bus.  This improves performance by eliminating a cache dump and associated ao2 container traversals to calculate the aggregate state.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   /trunk/tests/test_devicestate.c 409306 
>   /trunk/main/stasis_message.c 409306 
>   /trunk/main/stasis_cache.c 409306 
>   /trunk/main/devicestate.c 409306 
>   /trunk/main/app.c 409306 
>   /trunk/include/asterisk/stasis.h 409306 
>   /trunk/include/asterisk/devicestate.h 409306 
> 
> Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3281/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> All unit tests pass including the stasis and device state tests.
> 
> The device state unit test had to be changed to get the aggregate state out of the new cache location.  Fortunately, the normal users of the device state aggregate information subscribe to the events and don't get the aggregate device state out of the cache.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> rmudgett
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20140303/faa163d4/attachment-0001.html>