[asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 3600: testsuite: SIPNotify + PJSIPNotify behavioral tests

Jonathan Rose reviewboard at asterisk.org
Thu Jun 12 13:31:39 CDT 2014



> On June 11, 2014, 11:17 p.m., Matt Jordan wrote:
> > /asterisk/trunk/lib/python/asterisk/sipp.py, line 212
> > <https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3600/diff/2/?file=59546#file59546line212>
> >
> >     The "W" in there does not read well at all. We're also using the acronym "SIP" - in all caps - while CamelCasing the acronym "Ami".
> >     
> >     How about one of:
> >     
> >     SIPpAMITestCase
> >     SIPpActionTestCase
> >     SIPpAMIActionTestCase
> >

Going with SIPpAMIActionTestCase since I think that's most concise.


> On June 11, 2014, 11:17 p.m., Matt Jordan wrote:
> > /asterisk/trunk/lib/python/asterisk/sipp.py, lines 227-232
> > <https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3600/diff/2/?file=59546#file59546line227>
> >
> >     You don't actually need ami_command. What you need are:
> >     
> >     ami_args - to execute the action
> >     
> >     Optionally, ami_delay
> >     
> >     You need to decide if an AMI action is required. You have a mix here: the constructor allows it to be optional, but the execution on AMI connection expects self.ami_args and self.ami_delay to both exist

Let's go ahead and make it required. If someone isn't going to have an AMI action, they should just use SIPpTestCase.


> On June 11, 2014, 11:17 p.m., Matt Jordan wrote:
> > /asterisk/trunk/lib/python/asterisk/sipp.py, line 227
> > <https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3600/diff/2/?file=59546#file59546line227>
> >
> >     Why are you referencing the private self._test_config when you were just passed it as a parameter to this function?


- Jonathan


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3600/#review12132
-----------------------------------------------------------


On June 11, 2014, 11:18 p.m., Jonathan Rose wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3600/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated June 11, 2014, 11:18 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Asterisk Developers, Matt Jordan and Mark Michelson.
> 
> 
> Repository: testsuite
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Tests for the following behavior in PJSIPNotify action:
> *PJSIPNotify sends notify messages with specified custom headers
> *PJSIPNotify does not override reserved headers
> *PJSIPNotify sends notify message content in the order that it was specified in the manager action
> 
> Tests the following behavior in SIPNotify action:
> *SIPNotify sends notify messages with specified custom headers
> *SIPNotify sends notify message content in the order that it was specified in the manager action
> 
> SIPNotify does not prevent modification of reserved headers, so that is not tested for SIPNotify. Whether or not it should is another question.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   /asterisk/trunk/tests/channels/pjsip/ami/tests.yaml 5094 
>   /asterisk/trunk/tests/channels/pjsip/ami/pjsip_notify/tests.yaml PRE-CREATION 
>   /asterisk/trunk/tests/channels/pjsip/ami/pjsip_notify/reserved_headers/test-config.yaml PRE-CREATION 
>   /asterisk/trunk/tests/channels/pjsip/ami/pjsip_notify/reserved_headers/sipp/options.xml PRE-CREATION 
>   /asterisk/trunk/tests/channels/pjsip/ami/pjsip_notify/reserved_headers/configs/ast1/pjsip.conf PRE-CREATION 
>   /asterisk/trunk/tests/channels/pjsip/ami/pjsip_notify/custom_headers/test-config.yaml PRE-CREATION 
>   /asterisk/trunk/tests/channels/pjsip/ami/pjsip_notify/custom_headers/sipp/options.xml PRE-CREATION 
>   /asterisk/trunk/tests/channels/pjsip/ami/pjsip_notify/custom_headers/configs/ast1/pjsip.conf PRE-CREATION 
>   /asterisk/trunk/tests/channels/pjsip/ami/pjsip_notify/content/test-config.yaml PRE-CREATION 
>   /asterisk/trunk/tests/channels/pjsip/ami/pjsip_notify/content/sipp/options.xml PRE-CREATION 
>   /asterisk/trunk/tests/channels/pjsip/ami/pjsip_notify/content/configs/ast1/pjsip.conf PRE-CREATION 
>   /asterisk/trunk/tests/channels/SIP/tests.yaml 5094 
>   /asterisk/trunk/tests/channels/SIP/ami/tests.yaml PRE-CREATION 
>   /asterisk/trunk/tests/channels/SIP/ami/sip_notify/tests.yaml PRE-CREATION 
>   /asterisk/trunk/tests/channels/SIP/ami/sip_notify/custom_headers/test-config.yaml PRE-CREATION 
>   /asterisk/trunk/tests/channels/SIP/ami/sip_notify/custom_headers/sipp/options.xml PRE-CREATION 
>   /asterisk/trunk/tests/channels/SIP/ami/sip_notify/custom_headers/configs/ast1/sip.conf PRE-CREATION 
>   /asterisk/trunk/tests/channels/SIP/ami/sip_notify/content/test-config.yaml PRE-CREATION 
>   /asterisk/trunk/tests/channels/SIP/ami/sip_notify/content/sipp/options.xml PRE-CREATION 
>   /asterisk/trunk/tests/channels/SIP/ami/sip_notify/content/configs/ast1/sip.conf PRE-CREATION 
>   /asterisk/trunk/lib/python/asterisk/sipp.py 5094 
> 
> Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3600/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Ran tests, mangled the expectations to create failures for each test.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jonathan Rose
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20140612/93fbac52/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the asterisk-dev mailing list