[asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 3763: media formats: Fix appending of compatible formats

[Matt Jordan]

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3763/#review12596
-----------------------------------------------------------


I'm not sure I understand the problem for your issue description:

"When ast_format_cap_append was replaced with ast_format_cap_append_from_cap, the behavior of the original function was not preserved. This change introduces ast_format_cap_append_compatible_from_cap which reproduces the original behavior of ast_format_cap_append and alters the original users of ast_format_cap_append to use ast_format_cap_append_compatible_from_cap."

What behavioural difference was changed? Why do we need to switch it back? What is the intent of ast_format_cap_append_compatible_from_cap? And why wouldn't you just use ast_format_cap_get_compatible?



- Matt Jordan


On July 12, 2014, 9:19 p.m., opticron wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3763/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated July 12, 2014, 9:19 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Asterisk Developers, Corey Farrell and Matt Jordan.
> 
> 
> Repository: Asterisk
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> When ast_format_cap_append was replaced with ast_format_cap_append_from_cap, the behavior of the original function was not preserved. This change introduces ast_format_cap_append_compatible_from_cap which reproduces the original behavior of ast_format_cap_append and alters the original users of ast_format_cap_append to use ast_format_cap_append_compatible_from_cap.
> 
> The primary difference in behavior is that ast_format_cap_append_from_cap appends unconditionally from the source format capability while ast_format_cap_append checks for compatibility with ast_format_cap_iscompatible.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   team/group/media_formats-reviewed-trunk/res/res_pjsip_session.c 418441 
>   team/group/media_formats-reviewed-trunk/res/res_pjsip_sdp_rtp.c 418441 
>   team/group/media_formats-reviewed-trunk/main/format_cap.c 418441 
>   team/group/media_formats-reviewed-trunk/include/asterisk/format_cap.h 418441 
>   team/group/media_formats-reviewed-trunk/channels/chan_sip.c 418441 
>   team/group/media_formats-reviewed-trunk/addons/chan_ooh323.c 418441 
> 
> Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3763/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Ensured that calling a channel via Dial() produced the same behavior as trunk.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> opticron
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20140713/98e8dc18/attachment.html>