[asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 3184: Create sorcery instance registry

[Joshua Colp]

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3184/#review10790
-----------------------------------------------------------


Only minor points but I'd really like to see a unit test for this.


branches/12/include/asterisk/sorcery.h
<https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3184/#comment20338>

    Document that the returned instance has the reference count increased so the caller knows they have to unref.



branches/12/main/sorcery.c
<https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3184/#comment20337>

    Mark this as being safe so if someone looks at it they don't go "say what"


- Joshua Colp


On Feb. 6, 2014, 5 p.m., George Joseph wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3184/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 6, 2014, 5 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Asterisk Developers.
> 
> 
> Bugs: ASTERISK-22537
>     https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-22537
> 
> 
> Repository: Asterisk
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Create sorcery instance registry as a precursor to creating a generic dialplan function that can retrieve parameters from a sorcery-based config file.
> 
> ast_sorcery_init now creates a hashtab as a registry.
> ast_sorcery_open now checks the hashtab for an existing sorcery instance matching the caller's module name.  If it finds one, it bumps the refcount and returns it.  If not, it creates a new sorcery instance, adds it to the hashtab, then returns it.
> ast_sorcery_retrieve_by_module_name is a new function that does a hashtab lookup by module name.  It can be called by the future dialplan function.
> 
> A side effect of this patch is that a module can only have 1 sorcery instance (because it's the key for the hashtab).  res_pjsip/config_system needed a small change to share the main res_pjsip sorcery instance.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   branches/12/res/res_pjsip/include/res_pjsip_private.h 407566 
>   branches/12/res/res_pjsip/config_system.c 407566 
>   branches/12/res/res_pjsip.c 407566 
>   branches/12/main/sorcery.c 407566 
>   branches/12/include/asterisk/sorcery.h 407566 
> 
> Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3184/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Made sure that users of sorcery (mostly res_pjsip) continued to load their configs correctly.
> Made sure there were no ill effects on res_pjsip from config_system sharing the same sorcery instance as the rest of the pjsip infrastructure.
> Made sure that config_system was properly marked as 'not reloadable' and that it was maintaining it's original values when res_pjsip was reloaded.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> George Joseph
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20140206/b6415b51/attachment-0001.html>