[asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 3180: Documenation: Configuration section naming in pjsip.conf.sample needs a little clarification

[Scott Griepentrog]

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3180/#review10754
-----------------------------------------------------------



/branches/12/configs/pjsip.conf.sample
<https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3180/#comment20252>

    It isn't clear how/that AORs would be matched when identify is used.  Honestly, I'm not sure on that myself.


- Scott Griepentrog


On Feb. 4, 2014, 5:12 p.m., rnewton wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3180/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 4, 2014, 5:12 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Asterisk Developers.
> 
> 
> Repository: Asterisk
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> There is some nuance to naming configuration sections. In the long term I'll hope that configuration section names become a bit more arbitrary; in the short term help me make sure this documentation patch clarifies things.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   /branches/12/configs/pjsip.conf.sample 407338 
> 
> Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3180/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Only adding informational text to the pjsip.conf.sample file.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> rnewton
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20140204/50767542/attachment.html>