[asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 3405: Add ast_spinlock capability
reviewboard at asterisk.org
Tue Apr 15 18:31:42 CDT 2014
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
(Updated April 15, 2014, 5:31 p.m.)
Review request for Asterisk Developers.
Updated sparc implementation.
Now ready for prime time...
This patch adds support for spinlocks in Asterisk.
There are cases in Asterisk where it might be desirable to lock a short critical code section but not incur the context switch and yield penalty of a mutex or rwlock. The primary spinlock implementations execute exclusively in userspace and therefore don't incur those penalties. Spinlocks are NOT meant to be a general replacement for mutexes. They should be used only for protecting short blocks of critical code such as simple compares and assignments. Operations that may block, hold a lock, or cause the thread to give up it's timeslice should NEVER be attempted in a spinlock.
7 implementations were tested on various i366, x86_64, ARM and Sparc platforms running Linux, FreeBSD, OSX and Solaris. The test suite and results can be found here... https://github.com/gtjoseph/spintest
Tested various spinlock implementations.
+ GCC Atomics gcc_atomics
+ x86 assembly gas_x86
+ ARM assembly gas_arm
+ Sparc assembly gas_sparc
+ OSX Atomics osx_atomics
+ pthreads spinlock pthread_spinlock
+ pthreads mutex pthread_mutex
+ pthreads adaptive mutex pthread_mutex_adaptive_np
Not all implementations were available on all platforms. For instance, the gas_x86 implementation won't be available on an arm or sparc platform.
Each implementation was tested with the same locking scenario which is a short block of compares and assignments representing the most anticipated Asterisk use cases. The test case was run in a tight loop of 25,000,000 iterations executed in parallel by 1..5 simultaneous threads.
The test suite was run on the following platforms:
For each platform tested, the real, user and system times were captured in csv form and the final real and system times graphed.
+ The GCC Atomics implementation was available on all platforms and generally had the best performance.
+ The native assembly implementations generally performed on par with the GCC Atomics implementation.
+ The pthread_spinlock implementation was not available on Darwin but performed well on the other platforms.
+ The OSX Atomics implementation performed well on Darwin.
+ The pthread_mutex_adaptive implementation was not available on all platforms and it's performance was noticeably worse on the supported platforms.
+ The pthread_mutex implementation was available on all platforms but clearly showed the effects of context switching (high sys time) as lock contention grew.
+ GCC Atomics should be the first implementation choice.
+ The native assembly implementations should be the second choices.
+ The pthread_spinlock implementation should be the third choice on non-Darwin platforms.
+ OSX Atomics should be the third choice on Darwin.
+ The pthread_mutex_adaptive implementation should be eliminated.
+ The pthread_mutex implementation should be the implementation of last resort.
+ If none of the implementations are available, a compilation #error will be raised.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the asterisk-dev