[asterisk-dev] Time to rename chan_gulp?

[Olle E. Johansson]

6 maj 2013 kl. 11:37 skrev jg <webaccounts at jgoettgens.de>:

> Compared with Mitsubishi's "Pajero" disaster (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitsubishi_Pajero), "gulp" seems to be harmless.
> 
> Nevertheless, why not use a conservative approach and keep chan_sip and introduce a naming scheme for deprecated and obsolete channels, that could be used for overhauled channels in the future as well? After all, if for some reason the old tech cannot be abandoned, a variable can be used to dispatch the real name to centralize the channel selection.

It will take many releases before we can deprecate chan_sip. The more people that join testing and help making chan_pjsip useful and stable, the better. But don't expect it to be ready for production day one.

/O