[asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 2503: Ensure res_sip SRTP support parses multiple crypto attributes properly
Matt Jordan
reviewboard at asterisk.org
Wed May 8 09:05:44 CDT 2013
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/2503/#review8483
-----------------------------------------------------------
Ship it!
Only a minor comment. Hooray for testing!
team/group/pimp_my_sip/res/res_sip_sdp_rtp.c
<https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/2503/#comment16376>
If we're going to ignore a crypto line, we should log out that we did so. That will help debugging why Asterisk responds with an answer different than what the offerer expected.
- Matt Jordan
On May 6, 2013, 6:13 p.m., opticron wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/2503/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated May 6, 2013, 6:13 p.m.)
>
>
> Review request for Asterisk Developers.
>
>
> Bugs: ASTERISK-21416
> https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-21416
>
>
> Repository: Asterisk
>
>
> Description
> -------
>
> This was found when writing additional tests for https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/2482/
>
> Chan_sip currently ignores crypto lines it doesn't understand so that it can find one that it can use and this allows res_sip to do the same.
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> team/group/pimp_my_sip/res/res_sip_sdp_rtp.c 387765
>
> Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/2503/diff/
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
> Ran the referenced tests.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> opticron
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20130508/e101cc2d/attachment.htm>
More information about the asterisk-dev
mailing list