[asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 2642: app_bridgewait: Add a name argument so that multiple holding bridges may be used
jrose
reviewboard at asterisk.org
Mon Jun 24 15:27:30 CDT 2013
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/2642/
-----------------------------------------------------------
(Updated June 24, 2013, 8:27 p.m.)
Review request for Asterisk Developers, Matt Jordan and rmudgett.
Changes
-------
Auto answer the call in response to potential problems with announcer channels joining the bridge.
Bugs: ASTERISK-21922
https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-21922
Repository: Asterisk
Description
-------
Previously the holding bridge used for bridgewait was a single bridge that once created would stick around until the application was unloaded.
Now things are a little more complicated. Each holding bridge has a name and will be destroyed when it is empty. Since it's theoretically possible to have channels enter a holding bridge without going through the bridge wait application, it isn't always possible to deliberately control when the bridge will be destroyed, so the bridge can effectively be abandoned and set to be destroyed once it empties out.
Diffs (updated)
-----
/trunk/main/bridging.c 392721
/trunk/include/asterisk/bridging.h 392721
/trunk/apps/app_bridgewait.c 392721
Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/2642/diff/
Testing
-------
Tested multiple simultaneous holding bridges, multiple channels in the same holding bridge, what would happen if one channel entered as another one was leaving but before the bridge was destroyed, tested bridges emptying out, tested module unload and module load after unload.
Thanks,
jrose
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20130624/4afcb429/attachment.htm>
More information about the asterisk-dev
mailing list