[asterisk-dev] [Code Review]: Add bridge tests to check transfer capabilites

opticron reviewboard at asterisk.org
Wed Jan 23 13:14:36 CST 2013



> On Jan. 22, 2013, 3:57 p.m., Mark Michelson wrote:
> > Any reason there are no CDR or CEL checks?

I didn't think about them when writing the test. Added CEL checks.  I'm currently having issues with CDR generation on my test dev system.


- opticron


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/2268/#review7705
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Jan. 10, 2013, 8:16 a.m., opticron wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/2268/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 10, 2013, 8:16 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Asterisk Developers.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> Test blind and attended transfers from Alice and Bob to ensure that the "T" and "t" options allow the correct parties to perform transfers when used from the Dial application and from BRIDGE_FEATURES.
> 
> 
> This addresses bug SWP-5268.
>     https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/SWP-5268
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   asterisk/trunk/tests/bridge/tests.yaml 3598 
>   asterisk/trunk/tests/bridge/transfer_capabilities/configs/ast1/extensions.conf PRE-CREATION 
>   asterisk/trunk/tests/bridge/transfer_capabilities/test-config.yaml PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/2268/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> opticron
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20130123/492e20b9/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the asterisk-dev mailing list