[asterisk-dev] [Code Review] AMI version 1.4 Specification Review Request

[tim_ringenbach]

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/2269/#review7638
-----------------------------------------------------------


In section 4.2, I'd like to see the message format spelled out a little bit more. What characters are allowed in the key, and in the value? Is there any escaping mechanism for embedded new lines, or colons in the key? I'm also thinking about this bug I filed a while back:  https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-20369

- tim_ringenbach


On Jan. 8, 2013, 8:41 a.m., Matt Jordan wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/2269/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 8, 2013, 8:41 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Asterisk Developers.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> A proposed revamp of the AMI protocol has been written and is available for discussion:
> 
> https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/AMI+1.4+Specification
> 
> Please note that this will change the AMI protocol significantly, and represents a major shift in how the protocol represents operations in Asterisk to consumers of the protocol.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/2269/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Matt
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20130108/fcb966b7/attachment.htm>