[asterisk-dev] [Code Review] bridging: Holding bridge technology and app_bridgewait

[rmudgett]

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/2342/#review7951
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


Other than what Mark pointed out it looks fine by me.


- rmudgett


On Feb. 25, 2013, 9:49 a.m., jrose wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/2342/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 25, 2013, 9:49 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Asterisk Developers and rmudgett.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> This fulfills some of the preliminary goals needed for refactoring parking. First I've created a bridging technology that is very minimalistic in nature (it doesn't do any actual communication between channels on a given holding bridge) for storing parked calls. This technology will also likely be used for queues and maybe some other stuff later on. Second, I've created an application that holds a reference to a single holding bridge which can place channels into the holding bridge.  It includes some options for playing music on hold, ringing, and for breaking the bridge (such as in a queue/park timeout) after a certain amount of time.
> 
> I haven't implemented any kind of silence generation since I'm not sure it would be necessary and I'm also just plain not sure how to do that at the moment.
> 
> 
> This addresses bug ASTERISK-21059.
>     https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-21059
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   /team/jrose/bridge_projects/apps/app_bridgewait.c PRE-CREATION 
>   /team/jrose/bridge_projects/bridges/bridge_holding.c PRE-CREATION 
>   /team/jrose/bridge_projects/include/asterisk/bridging.h 381895 
> 
> Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/2342/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> So far I've just been testing the app against the options and seeing how the channels work in bridges. Everything seems to work as expected.
> 
> exten => 40,1,Answer()
> exten => 40,n,BridgeWait(mS(8))
> exten => 40,n,Playback(tt-weasels)
> 
> exten => 41,1,Answer()
> exten => 41,n,BridgeWait(rS(10))
> exten => 41,n,Playback(queue-youarenext)
> 
> exten => 42,1,Answer()
> exten => 42,n,BridgeWait()
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> jrose
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20130227/e072ac04/attachment.htm>