[asterisk-dev] [Code Review] Fix timeouts for ast_waitfordigit_full
Mark Michelson
reviewboard at asterisk.org
Thu Sep 13 13:31:56 CDT 2012
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/2109/#review7056
-----------------------------------------------------------
Ship it!
- Mark
On Sept. 13, 2012, 12:06 p.m., David Lee wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/2109/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated Sept. 13, 2012, 12:06 p.m.)
>
>
> Review request for Asterisk Developers and Mark Michelson.
>
>
> Summary
> -------
>
> ast_waitfordigit_full would simply pass its timeout to ast_waitfor_nandfds, expecting it to decrement the timeout by however many milliseconds were waited. This is a problem if it consistently waits less than 1ms, the timeout will never be decremented, and we wait... FOREVER!
>
> This patch instead has ast_waitfordigit_full manage the timeout itself.
>
>
> This addresses bug ASTERISK-20375.
> https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-20375
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> /branches/1.8/include/asterisk/channel.h 373005
> /branches/1.8/main/channel.c 373005
>
> Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/2109/diff
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
> Mark confirmed that with the not-cleaned-up version of this patch, it fixed ASTERISK-20375. The cleanup consisted of changing variable names, adding comments, removing debug logging.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> David
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20120913/4e51cc70/attachment.htm>
More information about the asterisk-dev
mailing list