[asterisk-dev] [Code Review] F option for bridge application

[Mark Michelson]

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/1825/#review5865
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


- Mark


On March 22, 2012, 2:26 p.m., jrose wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/1825/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 22, 2012, 2:26 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Asterisk Developers, Mark Michelson and Matt Jordan.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> Similar to the F option added to queue, this adds a new option to the bridge application to transfer the party that gets bridged upon (awkwardly worded maybe) to a position in the dialplan specified by the bridge F option from the perspective of the channel that bridged.
> 
> Also moves a shared function from a couple of places for app_dial and app_queue into utils.
> 
> 
> This addresses bug ASTERISK-19282.
>     https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-19282
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   /trunk/main/utils.c 360188 
>   /trunk/apps/app_queue.c 360188 
>   /trunk/include/asterisk/utils.h 360188 
>   /trunk/main/features.c 360188 
>   /trunk/apps/app_dial.c 360188 
> 
> Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/1825/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> A sip phone would dial the following extension:
> exten => 045,1,NoOp(BindBape)
> exten => 045,2,Answer()
> exten => 045,3,Set(GLOBAL(CHANBAPE)=${CHANNEL})
> exten => 045,4,Playback(tt-weasels)
> exten => 045,5,Wait(30)
> exten => 045,6,HangUp()
> 
> 
> From here, a second phone would dial any of these extensions:
> exten => 046,1,NoOp(BrideBape)
> exten => 046,2,Answer()
> exten => 046,3,Bridge(${CHANBAPE}, F(5))
> exten => 046,4,Playback(tt-monkeys)
> exten => 046,5,NoOp(Finish!)
> exten => 046,6,NoOp(Finish More!)
> 
> exten => 047,1,NoOp(BridgeBape2)
> exten => 047,2,Answer()
> exten => 047,3,Bridge(${CHANBAPE}, F)
> exten => 047,4,Playback(tt-allbusy)
> exten => 047,5,NoOp(BridgeBape2 finish)
> 
> exten => 048,1,NoOp(BridgeBape3)
> exten => 048,2,Answer()
> exten => 048,3,Bridge(${CHANBAPE}, F(049,4))
> exten => 048,4,NoOp(Failure)
> 
> exten => 050,1,NoOp(BrigeBape4)
> exten => 050,2,Answer()
> exten => 050,3,Bridge(${CHANBAPE}, F(bridgetestcontext,20,1))
> 
> 
> Also this stuff:
> exten => 049,1,NoOp(Failure)
> exten => 049,2,NoOp(Failure)
> exten => 049,3,NoOp(Failure)
> exten => 049,4,Playback(tt-weasels)
> exten => 049,5,NoOp(BridgeBape3 Success)
> 
> [bridgetestcontext]
> exten => 20,1,NoOp(Successful bape4)
> exten => 20,n,Playback(tt-somethingwrong)
> 
> 
> For each of these cases, I just checked to make sure that hanging up the bridger resulted in the bridged party getting sent to the expected position.
> 
> There will be automated tests added for bridging in general as well as for this feature into testsuite soon as well.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> jrose
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20120322/008efcf1/attachment.htm>