[asterisk-dev] [Code Review]: Continuing from 1643 (Allow specifying which MixMonitor to Stop)
jrose
reviewboard at asterisk.org
Fri Jan 20 16:05:11 CST 2012
> On Jan. 20, 2012, 4:04 p.m., jrose wrote:
> > /trunk/apps/app_mixmonitor.c, line 561
> > <https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/1682/diff/2/?file=23501#file23501line561>
> >
> > changed to DATASTORE_ID_LEN - 1 because I realized this stuff will be my undoing.
While we are at it, I'm changing the size to 65 since 64 characters is a nice even amount of space.
- jrose
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/1682/#review5249
-----------------------------------------------------------
On Jan. 20, 2012, 4:02 p.m., jrose wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/1682/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated Jan. 20, 2012, 4:02 p.m.)
>
>
> Review request for Asterisk Developers, Mark Michelson and telecos.
>
>
> Summary
> -------
>
> Fixes style problems from r6 on https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/1643/
> Changes creation of character buffer to length of a pointer in characters + 3 (2 for 0x, 1 for terminating space)
>
> That might not be adequate. Richard was saying something about pointers on other operating systems having other dividing symbols in them. Well, at least ':'s.
>
> In my experiences though, a pointer is usually just something like 0x0123FEDC when printed with %p.
>
>
> This addresses bug ASTERISK-19096.
> https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-19096
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> /trunk/CHANGES 351538
> /trunk/apps/app_mixmonitor.c 351538
>
> Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/1682/diff
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> jrose
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20120120/6b34e002/attachment.htm>
More information about the asterisk-dev
mailing list