[asterisk-dev] [Code Review] avoid cppcheck warnings
wdoekes
reviewboard at asterisk.org
Tue Jan 17 14:11:25 CST 2012
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/1651/#review5203
-----------------------------------------------------------
Ship it!
Looks good to go, if you fix these little items ;)
trunk/addons/chan_mobile.c
<https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/1651/#comment9690>
The manual says 0 and -1. Suggest doing < 0 instead.
trunk/apps/app_chanspy.c
<https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/1651/#comment9691>
Unnecessary parens around ast_waitfor.
trunk/apps/app_queue.c
<https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/1651/#comment9692>
Unnecessary parens around 2nd pbx_builting_getvar_helper.
trunk/apps/app_queue.c
<https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/1651/#comment9693>
Adding spaces here was unnecessary. It looked fine as it was.
trunk/apps/app_voicemail.c
<https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/1651/#comment9694>
Space between ( and init_ shall go.
trunk/funcs/func_env.c
<https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/1651/#comment9695>
Should probably have kept the readlen= and did fbuf + readlen instead of fbuf + sizeof(fbuf) and this has more implications.
But I see this is already handled differently in other areas...
if (fread(fbuf, 1, sizeof(fbuf), ff) && !feof(ff)) { <-- that's a different bug, on line 639.. looks like we're missing a "< sizeof(fbuf)"
ast_log(LOG_ERROR, "Short read?!!\n");
fclose(ff);
return -1;
}
I think aborting is the right way. fread shouldn't do short reads according to the manual.
trunk/main/ast_expr2f.c
<https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/1651/#comment9696>
Spaces:
for (i = 0; i < (int)...
- wdoekes
On Jan. 12, 2012, 8:08 p.m., junky wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/1651/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated Jan. 12, 2012, 8:08 p.m.)
>
>
> Review request for Asterisk Developers.
>
>
> Summary
> -------
>
> By running cppcheck 1.52, i realized there was many errors/warnings.
>
> This patch fixes many of those.
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> trunk/addons/chan_mobile.c 349670
> trunk/addons/chan_ooh323.c 349670
> trunk/apps/app_alarmreceiver.c 349670
> trunk/apps/app_chanspy.c 349670
> trunk/apps/app_disa.c 349670
> trunk/apps/app_minivm.c 349670
> trunk/apps/app_osplookup.c 349670
> trunk/apps/app_queue.c 349670
> trunk/apps/app_voicemail.c 349670
> trunk/channels/chan_dahdi.c 349670
> trunk/channels/chan_iax2.c 349670
> trunk/channels/chan_misdn.c 349670
> trunk/channels/chan_skinny.c 349670
> trunk/channels/chan_usbradio.c 349670
> trunk/formats/format_h263.c 349670
> trunk/funcs/func_env.c 349670
> trunk/funcs/func_odbc.c 349670
> trunk/funcs/func_strings.c 349670
> trunk/main/acl.c 349670
> trunk/main/ast_expr2.c 349670
> trunk/main/ast_expr2f.c 349670
> trunk/main/pbx.c 349670
> trunk/main/udptl.c 349670
> trunk/res/res_phoneprov.c 349670
> trunk/utils/astman.c 349670
>
> Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/1651/diff
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
> still compile fine.
> Shouldn't have any impact on the code execution.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> junky
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20120117/db221f13/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the asterisk-dev
mailing list