[asterisk-dev] [Code Review] Initialize udptl only when dialog negotiates for image media

Matt Jordan reviewboard at asterisk.org
Mon Jan 16 11:04:06 CST 2012


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/1668/
-----------------------------------------------------------

(Updated Jan. 16, 2012, 11:04 a.m.)


Review request for Asterisk Developers, Joshua Colp, Mark Michelson, Terry Wilson, and schmidts.


Changes
-------

Addressed mmichelson's comments.  Removed the set fd from sip_alloc as well - the more I thought about it, the more it felt like keeping it was wrong.


Summary
-------

Currently, the udptl object is allocated in one of three places:
1) create_addr_from_peer
2) sip_alloc
3) handle_request_invite

This typically results in any dialog associated with a peer that supports T.38 having a udptl object (and its associated UDP ports, system resources, etc.) assigned to it.  This includes non-INVITE requests.

This patch moves the initialization of a dialog's udptl object to either (a) when the media is negotiated for that dialog, or (b) if a control frame is received in chan_sip indicating that the dialog needs to support T.38.  This should result in only those dialogs that are explicitly involved with sending / receiving image media having a udptl object assigned to them.


This addresses bugs ASTERISK-16698 and ASTERISK-16794.
    https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-16698
    https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-16794


Diffs (updated)
-----

  /branches/1.8/channels/chan_sip.c 350786 

Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/1668/diff


Testing
-------

Patch passes the udptl tests in the Asterisk Test Suite.  

[update] - ported the patch to Asterisk 10 and tested with the Test Suite's gateway tests.  All tests passed.

However, given the complexity and number of ways in which media can be negotiated, additional testing would be appreciated from the open source community.


Thanks,

Matt

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20120116/224e38ff/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the asterisk-dev mailing list