[asterisk-dev] [Code Review] avoid cppcheck warnings

Tilghman Lesher reviewboard at asterisk.org
Mon Jan 9 11:53:30 CST 2012


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/1651/#review5137
-----------------------------------------------------------



trunk/addons/chan_mobile.c
<https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/1651/#comment9563>

    This still needs to be checking the return value which can be 0 or -1, and if -1, checking errno.  I know you didn't write the code, but removing the error stub isn't the right answer, either.



trunk/addons/chan_ooh323.c
<https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/1651/#comment9564>

    As noted by putnopvut previously, now that we're not retrieving a value, this line is a no-op.  I suspect that this points to another problem that should be fixed, and thus removing the stub isn't really a code improvement.



trunk/apps/app_chanspy.c
<https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/1651/#comment9565>

    Add braces while you're here.



trunk/apps/app_voicemail.c
<https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/1651/#comment9566>

    This is another indication that the return value should be checked.  Instead of removing that indication, check it.



trunk/apps/app_voicemail.c
<https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/1651/#comment9568>

    Kill red blob



trunk/channels/chan_dahdi.c
<https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/1651/#comment9569>

    flose()?  What does flose() do?



trunk/main/ast_expr2f.c
<https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/1651/#comment9570>

    Kill the red blobs.


- Tilghman


On Jan. 8, 2012, 9:07 p.m., junky wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/1651/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 8, 2012, 9:07 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Asterisk Developers.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> By running cppcheck 1.52, i realized there was many errors/warnings.
> 
> This patch fixes many of those.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   trunk/addons/chan_mobile.c 349670 
>   trunk/addons/chan_ooh323.c 349670 
>   trunk/apps/app_alarmreceiver.c 349670 
>   trunk/apps/app_chanspy.c 349670 
>   trunk/apps/app_disa.c 349670 
>   trunk/apps/app_minivm.c 349670 
>   trunk/apps/app_osplookup.c 349670 
>   trunk/apps/app_queue.c 349670 
>   trunk/apps/app_voicemail.c 349670 
>   trunk/channels/chan_dahdi.c 349670 
>   trunk/channels/chan_iax2.c 349670 
>   trunk/channels/chan_misdn.c 349670 
>   trunk/channels/chan_skinny.c 349670 
>   trunk/channels/chan_usbradio.c 349670 
>   trunk/formats/format_h263.c 349670 
>   trunk/funcs/func_env.c 349670 
>   trunk/funcs/func_odbc.c 349670 
>   trunk/funcs/func_strings.c 349670 
>   trunk/main/acl.c 349670 
>   trunk/main/ast_expr2.c 349670 
>   trunk/main/ast_expr2f.c 349670 
>   trunk/main/pbx.c 349670 
>   trunk/main/udptl.c 349670 
>   trunk/res/res_phoneprov.c 349670 
>   trunk/utils/astman.c 349670 
> 
> Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/1651/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> still compile fine.
> Shouldn't have any impact on the code execution.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> junky
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20120109/14451a25/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the asterisk-dev mailing list