[asterisk-dev] [Code Review]: avoid cppcheck warnings
junky
reviewboard at asterisk.org
Thu Jan 5 20:13:02 CST 2012
> On Jan. 5, 2012, 10:54 a.m., Mark Michelson wrote:
> > trunk/addons/chan_ooh323.c, line 3677
> > <https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/1651/diff/1/?file=22543#file22543line3677>
> >
> > Since res will always be 0 here, I think it's more clear to keep this as "return 0;". Instead, I think you should remove the res variable from this function.
removed the res variable, since reload_config() always return 0.
> On Jan. 5, 2012, 10:54 a.m., Mark Michelson wrote:
> > trunk/apps/app_chanspy.c, lines 975-976
> > <https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/1651/diff/1/?file=22544#file22544line975>
> >
> > Instead of getting rid of "num" change line 975 to use "num" as its second argument.
> >
> > Also, I'm not a fan of using atoi() in this way. atoi() will return 0 if the input cannot be parsed as a number OR if the number is 0. strtol() is better for this sort of thing.
>
> Matt Jordan wrote:
> strtol returns a 0 in the case of a conversion error as well. You could check the errno after the conversion, but in general, sscanf is the preferred option.
just by using the num variable in the ast_say_digits(), it avoid the cppcheck warning.
> On Jan. 5, 2012, 10:54 a.m., Mark Michelson wrote:
> > trunk/apps/app_voicemail.c, lines 3060-3069
> > <https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/1651/diff/1/?file=22548#file22548line3060>
> >
> > There is a bug here, but your change is not fixing it.
> >
> > The first line in the else block should be using "quote + 1" instead of "buf + 1" in the strchr() call. Make that change instead.
>
> rmudgett wrote:
> There are more problems with this code than what you have pointed out since strchr can return NULL and eol_pnt is used without checking for it.
> Also shouldn't the return value be quote + 1 instead of buf + 1 ?
>
> Mark Michelson wrote:
> Indeed. It should probably be something like:
>
> if (!(quote = strchr(buf, '\"'))) {
> if ((eol_pnt = strchr(buf, '/')) || (eol_pnt = strchr(buf, '}'))) {
> *eol_pnt = '\0';
> }
> return buf;
> } else {
> if ((eol_pnt = strchr(quote + 1, '\"'))) {
> *eol_pnt = '\0';
> }
> return quote + 1;
> }
>
> wdoekes wrote:
> P.S.: '\"' should be just '"'
added what Mark proposed.
- junky
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/1651/#review5107
-----------------------------------------------------------
On Jan. 5, 2012, 8:12 p.m., junky wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/1651/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated Jan. 5, 2012, 8:12 p.m.)
>
>
> Review request for Asterisk Developers.
>
>
> Summary
> -------
>
> By running cppcheck 1.52, i realized there was many errors/warnings.
>
> This patch fixes many of those.
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> trunk/addons/chan_mobile.c 349670
> trunk/addons/chan_ooh323.c 349670
> trunk/apps/app_chanspy.c 349670
> trunk/apps/app_minivm.c 349670
> trunk/apps/app_osplookup.c 349670
> trunk/apps/app_queue.c 349670
> trunk/apps/app_voicemail.c 349670
> trunk/funcs/func_env.c 349670
> trunk/funcs/func_odbc.c 349670
> trunk/funcs/func_strings.c 349670
> trunk/main/pbx.c 349670
>
> Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/1651/diff
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
> still compile fine.
> Shouldn't have any impact on the code execution.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> junky
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20120106/2222b456/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the asterisk-dev
mailing list