[asterisk-dev] [Code Review] testing CDR(accountcode) being carried over into local channels
wdoekes
reviewboard at asterisk.org
Wed Feb 22 16:16:10 CST 2012
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/1765/
-----------------------------------------------------------
Review request for Asterisk Developers.
Summary
-------
There's a change in the CDRs between 1.6.2 and 1.8 with regards to the CDR(accountcode).
I created an example:
exten => 1,1,Set(CDR(accountcode)=initial)
exten => 1,n,Dial(Local/2 at default)
exten => 2,1,Dial(Local/3 at default)
exten => 3,1,Set(CDR(accountcode)=third)
Master.csv of 1.6.2:
"third","","3","default","","Local/3 at default-ABCD;2","","Hangup","","2012-02-22 00:00:00","2012-02-22 00:00:00","2012-02-22 00:00:00",0,0,"ANSWERED","DOCUMENTATION","1329946580.5",""
"initial","","2","default","","Local/2 at default-ABCD;2","Local/3 at default-ABCD;1","Dial","Local/3 at default","2012-02-22 00:00:00","2012-02-22 00:00:00","2012-02-22 00:00:00",0,0,"ANSWERED","DOCUMENTATION","1329946580.3",""
"initial","","1","default","","Local/1 at default-ABCD;2","Local/2 at default-ABCD;1","Dial","Local/2 at default","2012-02-22 00:00:00","2012-02-22 00:00:00","2012-02-22 00:00:00",0,0,"ANSWERED","DOCUMENTATION","1329946580.1",""
"","","1","default","","Local/1 at default-ABCD;1","","Echo","","2012-02-22 00:00:00","2012-02-22 00:00:00","2012-02-22 00:00:00",0,0,"ANSWERED","DOCUMENTATION","1329946580.0",""
.. seems logically ordered.
Master.csv of 1.8:
"","","2","default","","Local/2 at default-ABCD;2","Local/3 at default-ABCD;1","Dial","Local/3 at default","2012-02-22 00:00:00","2012-02-22 00:00:00","2012-02-22 00:00:00",0,0,"ANSWERED","DOCUMENTATION","1329946580.3",""
"third","","3","default","","Local/3 at default-ABCD;2","","Hangup","","2012-02-22 00:00:00","2012-02-22 00:00:00","2012-02-22 00:00:00",0,0,"ANSWERED","DOCUMENTATION","1329946580.5",""
"initial","","1","default","","Local/1 at default-ABCD;2","Local/2 at default-ABCD;1","Dial","Local/2 at default","2012-02-22 00:00:00","2012-02-22 00:00:00","2012-02-22 00:00:00",0,0,"ANSWERED","DOCUMENTATION","1329946580.1",""
"","","1","default","","Local/1 at default-ABCD;1","","Echo","","2012-02-22 00:00:00","2012-02-22 00:00:00","2012-02-22 00:00:00",0,0,"ANSWERED","DOCUMENTATION","1329946580.0",""
.. has disorder where the first record should be second, and I'm missing the CDR(accountcode) in said record.
I don't know if CSV ordering is important (although the CDR tests' add_expectation() seems to imply they are fixed), but not having the CDR(accountcode) propagated to the Local channels is an undesirable change.
This addresses bug ASTERISK-19384.
https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-19384
Diffs
-----
/asterisk/trunk/tests/cdr/cdr_accountcode/configs/ast1/cdr.conf PRE-CREATION
/asterisk/trunk/tests/cdr/cdr_accountcode/configs/ast1/extensions.conf PRE-CREATION
/asterisk/trunk/tests/cdr/cdr_accountcode/run-test PRE-CREATION
/asterisk/trunk/tests/cdr/cdr_accountcode/test-config.yaml PRE-CREATION
/asterisk/trunk/tests/cdr/tests.yaml 3036
Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/1765/diff
Testing
-------
See above.
Can someone confirm that the CSV of 1.6.2 is the "correct" one?
Thanks,
wdoekes
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20120222/3518f2d6/attachment.htm>
More information about the asterisk-dev
mailing list