[asterisk-dev] [Code Review] chan_sip: removing some non-compliant code in v10 and minor fixes
Paul Belanger
reviewboard at asterisk.org
Wed Oct 19 14:12:36 CDT 2011
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/1533/#review4533
-----------------------------------------------------------
Not sure about the SIP RFC however it would be nice to see some unit tests for these cases. I think they could be added into the sip_uri parsing tests.
- Paul
On Oct. 19, 2011, 12:30 p.m., wdoekes wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/1533/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated Oct. 19, 2011, 12:30 p.m.)
>
>
> Review request for Asterisk Developers and Paul Belanger.
>
>
> Summary
> -------
>
> See the bug report: there were some XXX'es in the code about code that should be removed.
>
> The patch does this:
>
> (1) register_verify won't accept a To: without user-part anymore (illegal according to rfc3261, 10.2)
>
> (2) check_user_full still doesn't require a user-part, but it won't match usernames by domain anymore. (i.e. it doesn't treat sip:domain as sip:domain at domain anymore)
>
> (3) there was some freaky logic going on in get_msg_text, I had to rewrite it to make it make sense.
>
> (4) in the reqresp parser there were lots of if (params) inside a big if (params) block. I scrapped the useless if's.
>
>
> This addresses bug ASTERISK-18389.
> https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-18389
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> /trunk/channels/chan_sip.c 341249
> /trunk/channels/sip/reqresp_parser.c 341249
>
> Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/1533/diff
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
> It compiles.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> wdoekes
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20111019/7ea8e7d7/attachment.htm>
More information about the asterisk-dev
mailing list