[asterisk-dev] [Code Review]: Add #includeif statement
wdoekes
reviewboard at asterisk.org
Thu Nov 3 02:57:04 CDT 2011
On Nov. 3, 2011, 2:49 a.m., Paul Belanger wrote:
> > As for the name -- I would've preferred #require vs. #include, but it's a bit late for that now ;)
> >
> > The other options:
> >
> > #sinclude +1
> > #tryinclude +.5
> > #includeif +0
The reason:
I rate the "similar usage in a different domain" (sinclude in m4) higher than self-documentation in this case. (PHP's require/include has them both.)
Why? Many people use several languages daily, and having to remember that sinclude is called yinclude in language z is a larger PITA than having to look up the not-self-documenting name, that sinclude unfortunately is, the first time.
- wdoekes
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/1476/#review4649
-----------------------------------------------------------
On Sept. 30, 2011, 2:56 p.m., Paul Belanger wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/1476/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated Sept. 30, 2011, 2:56 p.m.)
>
>
> Review request for Asterisk Developers and leifmadsen.
>
>
> Summary
> -------
>
> Talking with Leif on IRC today, he was asking for a way to include a config file, that might not exist all the time. Because #include 'foo.conf' to a non existing will fail to load a module, we decided #includeif might be better.
>
> #exec cat foo.conf is another option, however this seems to require more CPU and opens a potential security issue.
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> trunk/CHANGES 338717
> trunk/main/config.c 338717
>
> Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/1476/diff
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
> Local development box testing. A few more testers would be nice :D
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Paul
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20111103/51781aad/attachment.htm>
More information about the asterisk-dev
mailing list