[asterisk-dev] [Code Review] extra ast_strlen_zero() check in cel_odbc prevents integer eventtype in database
Tilghman Lesher
reviewboard at asterisk.org
Sat Mar 26 17:12:24 CDT 2011
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/1149/#review3253
-----------------------------------------------------------
This change reverts revision 236847, which was reported on the -dev list by Nic Colledge. You need to address his comments, before this can go forward:
http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/2009-December/041362.html
- Tilghman
On 2011-03-26 11:43:38, mlehner wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/1149/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated 2011-03-26 11:43:38)
>
>
> Review request for Asterisk Developers.
>
>
> Summary
> -------
>
> event_type could not be an integer datatype in a ODBC database because an extra ast_strlen_zero() check was wrapped around the code that did the work. ast_strlen_zero() check is done in the second branch of the if statement, after the check for eventtype is done. Changes are very simple, just removing the "overzealous" ast_strlen_zero() check, while keeping braces to prevent compilation errors and warnings with variable re-definitions.
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> /tags/1.8.3.2/cel/cel_odbc.c 311686
>
> Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/1149/diff
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
> Tested on a local install of Asterisk 1.8.3.2. Compiles and creates the expected records in the database.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> mlehner
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20110326/7a0c5210/attachment.htm>
More information about the asterisk-dev
mailing list