[asterisk-dev] [Code Review]: Read on idle timerfd will result in deadlocks

kobaz reviewboard at asterisk.org
Wed Jul 6 10:44:42 CDT 2011



> On July 6, 2011, 10:20 a.m., David Vossel wrote:
> > branches/1.8/res/res_timing_timerfd.c, lines 174-178
> > <https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/1255/diff/2/?file=16826#file16826line174>
> >
> >     I had to revert the patch from 1.8 and trunk.  This statement right hear is causing some serious performance problems.  See jrose's comment.
> >     
> >     If we comment out this line, everything works fine for him.
> 
> David Vossel wrote:
>     This same issue was reported here. https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-17867

So, the whole patch was reverted.  Is your vote to have the same code fix but minus the debugging?  I've also heard from several people that the fix works with the debugging removed.


- kobaz


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/1255/#review3813
-----------------------------------------------------------


On June 3, 2011, 4:11 p.m., kobaz wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/1255/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated June 3, 2011, 4:11 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Asterisk Developers and russelb.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> Fix for issue https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=18028
> And several others.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   branches/1.8/res/res_timing_timerfd.c 320171 
> 
> Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/1255/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Make enough calls to trigger a read on an idle timer
> 
> Wait for message:
> Reading attempt on idle timerfd. This would have caused a deadlock.
> 
> Deadlock avoided.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> kobaz
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20110706/d8a985f9/attachment.htm>


More information about the asterisk-dev mailing list