[asterisk-dev] [Code Review] Fix behavior of queue set penalty so that it properly handles 'queue set penalty <penalty> on <interface>' instead of crashing caused by r325483

[jrose]

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/1609/#review4925
-----------------------------------------------------------



/branches/10/apps/app_queue.c
<https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/1609/#comment9192>

    verb command will be removed.


- jrose


On Dec. 6, 2011, 10:03 a.m., jrose wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/1609/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Dec. 6, 2011, 10:03 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Asterisk Developers and irroot.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> r325483 caused Asterisk to lose the ability to set penalty on an interface without specifying the queue, and worse than that also introduces a segfault from trying to.  The segfault only occurs when penalty is set using the queue set penalty command in CLI and not when using QueuePenalty from the manager, however the manager action wouldn't work without specifying a queue either, it just wouldn't crash Asterisk.
> 
> This patch attempts to fix that by changing irroot's realtime patch so that the new method for picking the queue being acted on is only employed if the method used prior to that can't find a queue to work on and the command actually has a queue name specified.  This doesn't seem to cause any problems in normal queues, but I haven't tested it with realtime queues.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   /branches/10/apps/app_queue.c 346971 
> 
> Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/1609/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Various uses of queue set penalty and QueuePenalty from manager.  Also, I'm currently working on an automated test for this within the Asterisk testsuite.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> jrose
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20111206/9940bace/attachment.htm>