[asterisk-dev] Final call for changes to Asterisk 1.4 and 1.6.2

[Ron Arts]

Op 26-04-11 15:03, Russell Bryant schreef:
>
> On Apr 26, 2011, at 4:32 AM, Ron Arts wrote:
>
>> +1.
>
>
> I have the same comment here.  Can you please point me to the specific bug reports that have affected you?
 > I know 1.8 isn't perfect (or any other version of Asterisk), but it's useful to have additional feedback
 > on issues that have prevented migration.
>

No, my concerns are fed by the severity of bugs that are still being reported against 1.8. As long
as asterisk crashes are being reported as often as they are now, I consider 1.8 not to be
production ready. I am surprised the 1.10 branch was even opened.

I personally think a stable product should get at most a couple of crash reports per month,
and a development branch should not be opened until the former is the case.

I expect lots of people will not love me for saying this, but I think the asterisk developers
try to move forward to quickly.

But of course: just tell me it's open source, and I can do with it what I want. You're right,
and that's the road I've been dancing on for the last 7 years.

Ron Arts

> --
> Russell Bryant
> Digium, Inc.   |   Engineering Manager, Open Source Software
> 445 Jan Davis Drive NW    -     Huntsville, AL 35806  -  USA
> www.digium.com  -=-  www.asterisk.org -=- blogs.asterisk.org
>
>
>
>
> --
> _____________________________________________________________________
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>
> asterisk-dev mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>     http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev