[asterisk-dev] Proposed changes to Originate Action [Issue: 0017221]

[Ryan Bullock]

Hello Leo,

Their would be nothing stopping you from simply waiting for the the
OrignateComplete event in your application, before issuing any further
commands, to provide a synchronous/blocking behavior.

Regards,

Ryan Bullock

On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 2:42 PM, Leo Burd <leob at media.mit.edu> wrote:
> Hello there,
>
> For my kind of application, it would be great to keep the Async option
> and let users run synchronous requests to Originate.  Is that something
> that has already been ruled out of the plans?
>
> Best,
>
> Leo
>
>
>
> *
>> *
>> -------------------------------------*
>> [asterisk-dev] Proposed changes to Originate Action [Issue: 0017221]
>> *Ryan Bullock* rrb3942 at gmail.com
>> <mailto:asterisk-dev%40lists.digium.com?Subject=%5Basterisk-dev%5D%20Proposed%20changes%20to%20Originate%20Action%20%5BIssue%3A%0A%090017221%5D&In-Reply-To=-6860553992492326028%40unknownmsgid>
>> /Tue Apr 27 13:25:15 CDT 2010/
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> It does not help with this case, as the channel returned is from the
>> same functions as the old one.
>>
>> If you watch the manager events after doing an originate with a local
>> channel you will see the local channel get renamed to the appropriate
>> tech/data channel. It makes sense that the functions creating the call
>> cannot determine the end device and technology for a local channel, as
>> a the dialplan could end in any number of ways, depending on runtime
>> variables.
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Timothy Rodriguez
>> <timothy.rodriguez at gmail.com <http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev>> wrote:
>> >/ Great, thanks!
>> />/
>> />/ On Apr 27, 2010, at 11:17 AM, Ryan Bullock <rrb3942 at gmail.com <http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev>> wrote:
>> />/
>> />>/ So when you use 'Channel: Local/1234 at context <http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev>'?
>> />>/
>> />>/ I don't know if this will fix the problems introduced by masquerading.
>> />>/ If I get some time I will try to load up that scenario and test it.
>> />>/
>> />>/ --
>> />>/ _____________________________________________________________________
>> />>/ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>> />>/
>> />>/ asterisk-dev mailing list
>> />>/ To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>> />>/   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
>> />/
>> />/ --
>> />/ _____________________________________________________________________
>> />/ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>> />/
>> />/ asterisk-dev mailing list
>> />/ To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>> />/   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
>> />/
>> /
> *
>
> --
> _____________________________________________________________________
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>
> asterisk-dev mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
>