[asterisk-dev] 1.8 commit criteria
Russell Bryant
russell at digium.com
Wed Jul 21 20:24:54 CDT 2010
----- Original Message -----
> On 7/21/10 5:17 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-07-21 at 14:57 -0600, Philip Prindeville wrote:
> >
> > <snipped parts to avoid feeding the troll>
> >
> >> I'm trying to figure out what the cut-list criteria is for getting
> >> a fix into 1.8 is, which is in 2 days.
> > Code that is written to standards, provides value, is complete,
> > tested,
> > documented, and reviewed.
> >
> > This patch has not made it high enough on our (Digium's) priority
> > list
> > to spend a lot of time on, unfortunately. There has also been little
> > to
> > no test results posted by anyone other than the reporter on the
> > issue.
>
> Ok, understood. There's also the feature vs. fix dichotomy.
I definitely consider this a feature.
--
Russell Bryant
Digium, Inc. | Engineering Manager, Open Source Software
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
jabber: rbryant at digium.com -=- skype: russell-bryant
www.digium.com -=- www.asterisk.org -=- blogs.asterisk.org
More information about the asterisk-dev
mailing list