[asterisk-dev] signal

Russell Bryant russell at digium.com
Mon Jan 18 12:08:40 CST 2010


----- "Tilghman Lesher" <tlesher at digium.com> wrote:
> Given that sigaction(2) is better defined and is a POSIX-mandatory
> function,
> and given our aim that Asterisk requires a POSIX system, I don't see a
> good
> argument why we should not use sigaction(2) in preference to
> signal(2).

Also, if any such non-compliant system exists, a simple configure script check should make it easy to support it.

--
Russell Bryant
Digium, Inc. | Engineering Manager, Open Source Software
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
www.digium.com -=- www.asterisk.org -=- blogs.asterisk.org



More information about the asterisk-dev mailing list