[asterisk-dev] signal
Russell Bryant
russell at digium.com
Mon Jan 18 12:08:40 CST 2010
----- "Tilghman Lesher" <tlesher at digium.com> wrote:
> Given that sigaction(2) is better defined and is a POSIX-mandatory
> function,
> and given our aim that Asterisk requires a POSIX system, I don't see a
> good
> argument why we should not use sigaction(2) in preference to
> signal(2).
Also, if any such non-compliant system exists, a simple configure script check should make it easy to support it.
--
Russell Bryant
Digium, Inc. | Engineering Manager, Open Source Software
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
www.digium.com -=- www.asterisk.org -=- blogs.asterisk.org
More information about the asterisk-dev
mailing list