[asterisk-dev] Issue 16732 - device state change notification over manager

[Håkon Nessjøen]

On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 9:29 PM, Tilghman Lesher <tlesher at digium.com> wrote:

> I'm fine with the general concept, but I think the name should be along the
> lines of DEVICESTATE or DEVICESTATUS.  DEVICEINFO sounds a bit too generic
> and
> could potentially cause confusion with information about SIP peers and
> other
> types of information about specific devices.
>
> --
> Tilghman
>
>
I thought to use the name DEVICESTATE would be too specific, since all the
other classes are more general purpose ones. And since there wasn't a
'general' class for things like device states, I thought it could be nice to
have DEVICEINFO for more generic events about devices that could be added to
later.

But if it is ok to have a specific class for the device state information,
then I'm all in for using the name DEVICESTATE instead of DEVICEINFO.

--
Håkon
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20100203/ad0d0c17/attachment.htm