[asterisk-dev] [Code Review] more reliable sip STUN support

[Simon Perreault]

On 2010-08-04 09:38, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
> On 08/04/2010 08:20 AM, Marc Blanchet wrote:
>> The useful use case for STUN is for RTP trafic, isn't it?
> 
> Yes, that's what the most common use in this scenario is.

In this case the STUN traffic should be going out of the RTP socket, not
the SIP socket, and certainly not a separate socket for STUN only.

Simon
-- 
NAT64/DNS64 open-source --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca
STUN/TURN server        --> http://numb.viagenie.ca
vCard 4.0               --> http://www.vcarddav.org