[asterisk-dev] SIP STUN support testing

[Simon Perreault]

On 07/30/2010 02:31 PM, David Vossel wrote:
> I know very little about STUN, but it was obvious to me after reading
> this post, http://forums.asterisk.org/viewtopic.php?t=74252, that the
> issue of chan_sip using the same UDP socket for SIP traffic and STUN
> traffic wasn't good.  I wrote a patch that I hope with make our
> existing STUN support more reliable by handling STUN queries on a
> dedicated socket.  This patch can be found attached to this issue,
> https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=17622.

Just FYI, both are wrong. STUN shouldn't be used in this way at all.
STUN should be used as specified in RFC 5245.

(Not commenting on the appropriateness of this fix...)

Simon
-- 
NAT64/DNS64 open-source --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca
STUN/TURN server        --> http://numb.viagenie.ca
vCard 4.0               --> http://www.vcarddav.org