[asterisk-dev] [Code Review] ETSI Explicit Call Transfer (ECT) support. (libpri portion)

Tilghman Lesher tlesher at digium.com
Wed Apr 21 12:33:30 CDT 2010


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/521/#review1869
-----------------------------------------------------------



/team/group/ccss/libpri.h
<https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/521/#comment4061>

    Generally with API calls, it's preferable to spell out words, rather than use abbreviations.  In this case, I think "pri_transfer_response" would be preferable.



/team/group/ccss/pri.c
<https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/521/#comment4062>

    Add braces to new conditionals, for coding guidelines.



/team/group/ccss/pri.c
<https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/521/#comment4063>

    Kill whitespace.



/team/group/ccss/pri_facility.c
<https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/521/#comment4064>

    Could we change "enc" to "encode"?



/team/group/ccss/pri_facility.c
<https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/521/#comment4065>

    "rsp" to "response".
    
    There are more, but you get the idea.


- Tilghman


On 2010-02-19 15:30:49, rmudgett wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/521/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated 2010-02-19 15:30:49)
> 
> 
> Review request for Asterisk Developers.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> Added ability to send and receive ETSI Explicit Call Transfer (ECT) messages to eliminate tromboned calls.
> 
> Added ETSI support to an existing API call to send ECT messages when the upper level indicates to transfer specified calls.
> 
> The libpri API was extended to indicate to the upper layer that the far end requests the transfer of the indicated calls.
> 
> This is a two part review request.  Asterisk and libpri.  This is the libpri portion.
> https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/520/ is the asterisk portion.
> 
> Note: This change is based off of the libpri/team/group/ccss branch because of needed infrastructure improvements done in that branch.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   /team/group/ccss/libpri.h 1499 
>   /team/group/ccss/pri.c 1499 
>   /team/group/ccss/pri_facility.h 1499 
>   /team/group/ccss/pri_facility.c 1499 
>   /team/group/ccss/pri_internal.h 1499 
>   /team/group/ccss/pri_q931.h 1499 
>   /team/group/ccss/q931.c 1499 
> 
> Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/521/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> A -- *1 -- *2  -- B&C
> 
> Party A is on an ISDN phone.
> 
> A calls B
> A puts B on hold
> A calls C
> A hangs up to initiate transfer
> The B and C parties are now connected to each other and the calls are only connected through *2.
> 
> A calls B
> A puts B on hold
> A calls C
> A puts C on hold to retrieve B
> A hangs up to initiate transfer
> The B and C parties are now connected to each other and the calls are only connected through *2.
> 
> Repeat the above two tests but party A uses the EctExecute message instead of disconnecting to transfer the calls.
> 
> All four tests passed.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> rmudgett
> 
>




More information about the asterisk-dev mailing list