[asterisk-dev] Idea for GSoC: Support of PRACK in Asterisk

[Smita]

So are we looking at nonviable problems for GSoC? Or is there some
potential problem that can be carved out of the discussion?

Smita

On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 4:26 PM, Nic Bellamy <nicb-lists at vadacom.co.nz> wrote:
> Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
>
> Nic Bellamy wrote:
>
>
>
> If someone would pick this up as an GSoC project, I for one would
> welcome our new PRACK overlords.
>
>
> Unfortunately this is likely to be nearly impossible to add to chan_sip
> without first adding proper SIP transaction support, since the 1xx
> response/PRACK is a transaction (and of course we'd want to be able to
> support PRACK in both directions). Adding transaction support could be a
> worthwhile GSoC project, but the student doing the work would have to be
> pretty familiar with chan_sip already to be able to achieve it in three
> months :-)
>
>
> Yeah, I know. I didn't say it because I didn't want OEJ to throw a pineapple
> at me :-)
>
> Transaction support would be terribly nice; I've run into plenty of fun[1]
> over the years due to its lack.
>
> Cheers,
>     Nic.
>
> [1] In the non-fun sense of the word.
>
> --
> Nic Bellamy,
> Head Of Engineering, Vadacom Ltd - http://www.vadacom.co.nz/
>
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
>
> asterisk-dev mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
>