[asterisk-dev] CID match uses "shortest prefix match"
Jared Smith
jsmith at digium.com
Mon Mar 16 12:22:08 CDT 2009
----- "Klaus Darilion" <klaus.mailinglists at pernau.at> wrote:
> I tried the CID match feature of Asterisk (1.4.23) but found a strange
>
> behavior: it matches on shortest prefix, e.g:
>
> s/_+436991116! => &Macro1();
> s/_+4369911! => &Macro2();
>
Just out of curiosity... what happens when you use a "." instead of "!" in the pattern? Does it still behave the same way?
---
Jared Smith
Training Manager
Digium, Inc.
More information about the asterisk-dev
mailing list