[asterisk-dev] ten /proc/dahdi directories
Giorgio Incantalupo
gincantalupo at fgasoftware.com
Mon Jun 8 03:57:55 CDT 2009
Hi all,
this is the output of ls -l -i /proc:
4026531851 -r--r--r-- 1 root root 0 2009-06-08 10:50
cpuinfo
4026532218 -r--r--r-- 1 root root 0 2009-06-08 10:50
crypto
4026532679 dr-xr-xr-x 2 root root 0 2009-06-08 10:50
dahdi
4026532679 dr-xr-xr-x 2 root root 0 2009-06-08 10:50
dahdi
4026532679 dr-xr-xr-x 2 root root 0 2009-06-08 10:50
dahdi
4026532679 dr-xr-xr-x 2 root root 0 2009-06-08 10:50
dahdi
4026532679 dr-xr-xr-x 2 root root 0 2009-06-08 10:50
dahdi
4026532679 dr-xr-xr-x 2 root root 0 2009-06-08 10:50
dahdi
4026532679 dr-xr-xr-x 2 root root 0 2009-06-08 10:50
dahdi
4026532679 dr-xr-xr-x 2 root root 0 2009-06-08 10:50
dahdi
4026532679 dr-xr-xr-x 2 root root 0 2009-06-08 10:50 dahdi
4026532679 dr-xr-xr-x 2 root root 0 2009-06-08 10:50 dahdi
4026531850 -r--r--r-- 1 root root 0 2009-06-08 10:50
devices
4026531859 -r--r--r-- 1 root root 0 2009-06-08 10:50
diskstats
Incredible, isn't it?
Giorgio
Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 07:03:43PM +0530, Prince Singh wrote:
>
>> What is the output of this:-
>> ls -l -i --full-time /proc/
>>
>
> The time reported in procfs is meaningless.
>
> However the inode number isn't completely meaningless. So can you try
> a 'ls -i /proc' and see if all the dahdi-s have the same inode number?
>
> (I would be greatly surprised if they do have the same number)
>
>
--
Giorgio Incantalupo, mailto:gincantalupo at fgasoftware.com
Voice at work - The Agile PBX http://www.voiceatwork.eu
FG&A srl - http://www.fgasoftware.com
Tel: 02 997663.14, Fax: 02 91390172
More information about the asterisk-dev
mailing list