[asterisk-dev] SIP channel/owner question

[Klaus Darilion]

Russell Bryant schrieb:
> On Jan 21, 2009, at 4:32 AM, Klaus Darilion wrote:
> 
>> In SIP channel I have an struct ast_channel *ast. So, what is the
>> difference between:
>>
>> ast->hangupcause
>> and
>> ast->tech_pvt->owner->hangupcause
> 
> Assuming you're talking about "ast" as a parameter to a channel  
> technology callback, ast and ast->tech_pvt->owner should be the same  
> thing.

When is the owner set?

When an incoming INVITE is rejected with Hangup(1); ast->hangupcause is 
set. But the function __transmit_response adds X-Asterisk-Hangupcause 
according to ast->tech_pvt->owner->hangupcause. But as owner=NULL, the 
header will not be added.

At least this is the behavior of 1.4.23. Should I open a bug report?

klaus



> 
> --
> Russell Bryant
> Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Engineer, Open Source Team Lead
> 445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
> Check us out at: www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
> 
> asterisk-dev mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev