[asterisk-dev] SIP replies to via or to ip/port (according to RFC)
Alex Hermann
alex at speakup.nl
Thu Dec 17 03:17:17 CST 2009
On Thursday 17 December 2009 08:20:45 Olle E. Johansson wrote:
> Asterisk currently send SIP responses to the address in the address in the
> last VIA header in the SIP message received. If NAT support is turned on,
> we reply to the sender's IP and port.
> I suggest we take a final stab at resolving this bug report like this:
>
> - We add a setting "replytovia" with yes | no
> - We set it default to yes in the code and sample config for all releases
> (1.4, 1.6.x) - We set it to no in the code and sample config for trunk
>
> This way, we won't disturb current installs and will make it optional to
> follow the RFC in these versions. In trunk, we follow the RFC and make it
> optional (like in Kamailio) to not follow the RFC.
May I suggest an alternative approach:
A)
By default, strictly follow rfc3261 section 18.2.2 and rfc3581 when it comes
to sending replies. It covers all situations (including NAT) and as such there
is no need for a replytovia setting (the setting is removed from kamailio/sip-
router because it was acknowledged it was an unnecessary hack that served no
goal except to _create_ interoperability issues) .
B)
Convert the nat option to do the following:
nat=no: do nothing special, just follow rfc's strictly, thus allowing all
kinds of funny tricks with Via's and ip-addresses and allow for asymmetric
RTP.
nat=yes:
1) Force an rport parameter in the first Via header. The (default) procedures
described in paragraph A above will do the rest.
2) Force symmetric RTP.
Maybe splitting the nat= option to 2 separate options doing the above
functions might be a better choice. The ambiguous nat= option can be
eliminated altogether then.
--
Alex Hermann
More information about the asterisk-dev
mailing list