[asterisk-dev] possible bug in chan_vpb
john at spectross.com
john at spectross.com
Sun Nov 23 22:25:08 CST 2008
Hi Russell,
Thanks, you are right, "chan_vpb.cc" also uses the same technique.
The monitor thread here checks for events over both owned & orphan channels
& as an event is detected over an owned channel it creates a frame and
queues it up by calling "ast_queue_frame()".
Could you please recommend some document which would aid in understanding
the Asterisk Architecture(Developer's point of view). I found many E-books
for Asterisk users but not one for fresh Asterisk developers.
Thanks & Regds.
John
John Nicholas
Team Lead
Spectross Digital Systems Pvt. Ltd.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Russell Bryant" <russell at digium.com>
To: <john at spectross.com>; "Asterisk Developers Mailing List"
<asterisk-dev at lists.digium.com>
Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2008 4:45 AM
Subject: Re: [asterisk-dev] possible bug in chan_vpb
>
> On Nov 22, 2008, at 12:02 AM, <john at spectross.com> <john at spectross.com>
> wrote:
>> I was browsing through "chan_vpb.cc" today. I see that no "fds" (file
>> descriptors) are assigned while creation of an "ast_channel" structure
>> in "vpb_new".
>>
>> What I am not able to understand is: How would the "ast_waitfor*"
>> functions work as the events are captured using the "poll" api.
>>
>
> I have never touched that code, but I can say that there is one other
> method for a channel driver to indicate that data is available. Channel
> drivers can queue up media frames onto the channel using
> ast_queue_frame(). This puts the frame into a queue on the ast_channel,
> and also writes data to an alert pipe on the channel that is used to wake
> up poll(). chan_iax2 uses this method quite heavily since there is no
> dedicated socket per channel like there is for a call using RTP.
>
> --
> Russell Bryant
> Senior Software Engineer
> Open Source Team Lead
> Digium, Inc.
>
>
>
>
More information about the asterisk-dev
mailing list