[asterisk-dev] Reverse Inheritance
Vadim Lebedev
vadim at mbdsys.com
Mon Nov 10 19:47:33 CST 2008
Hello,
I understand the forward inheritance - a var defined for a channel
will be inherited by a child channel(s)
so reverse inheritance would be a var defined in the channel will be
inherited by a parent channel(s) right?
What will happend if tow sibling channels define the same +var?
Actually what could be a usage for reverse inheritance?
Thanks
Vadim
Le 11 nov. 08 à 01:11, Tilghman Lesher a écrit :
> During a review of one of the bugs on the bugtracker (13140), I
> found that
> somebody had implemented what is essentially a reverse-inheritance
> on a
> variable. What occurs to me is that if one person wants it, perhaps
> it would
> be wise to implement it in a general way, so that others may also
> benefit from
> that behavior.
>
> This brings up two questions in my mind. First, what are the
> safeguards that
> we must abide by to ensure that nothing unsafe happens? For one
> thing, I
> think it would be sensible to ensure that variables can only be set,
> not
> overwritten with this method. Can anybody think of other possible
> problems
> with implementing reverse inheritance?
>
> Second, how should variables be denoted? I have discussed this with
> Jared
> Smith, and we both agreed that using '+' in place of '_', where '_'
> means
> forward inheritance and '+' means reverse inheritance would be
> appropriate.
> Doubling either symbol would denote infinite inheritance in that
> particular
> direction. Is there any further discussion of this use, or is the
> usage
> of '+' an acceptable symbol?
>
> --
> Tilghman
>
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
>
> asterisk-dev mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
>
More information about the asterisk-dev
mailing list