[asterisk-dev] Time for a bug fix phase?

[Steve Murphy]

On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 22:23 +0400, Dmitry Andrianov wrote:
> By the way, I wonder how current CDR scheme will be working. Will it be just left as is or will it be removed from the PBX core and re-implemented as a CEL event consumer?
> 
> Making it just one of CEL consumers looks a good idea to m. Doing so will also quickly identify if anything is missing in CEL design (if existing CDR cannot be written using CEL, then something is probably wrong).
> 
> Regards,
> Dmitry Andrianov

No, CEL will not touch the current CDR implementation.

It may provide a rather similar capability, tho, if
a CEL->CDR backend converter is written.

My only thought is that writing an exact duplicate
(behavior-wise) of the current CDR implementation would
be a pretty tricky piece of code! And with little 
benefit. However, a much more versatile, broader, 
parameterized version might be worth the effort.

murf

-- 
Steve Murphy
Software Developer
Digium
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3227 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20080603/9ee78b67/attachment.bin