[asterisk-dev] [policy] Bug Tracker Workflow Discussion

Johansson Olle E oej at edvina.net
Thu Jul 10 14:38:14 CDT 2008

10 jul 2008 kl. 19.22 skrev Tilghman Lesher:

> On Thursday 10 July 2008 11:05:30 Johansson Olle E wrote:
>> 10 jul 2008 kl. 16.40 skrev Leif Madsen:
>>> Performance issues will only be considered for the
>>> release branch if they are considered significant, and should be
>>> approved by the maintainers.
>>> If there is ever a question about what should be included in the
>>> release
>>> branch, the maintainers should be allowed to make the decision.
>> What's the election procedure of the "maintainers" ?
>> Maybe this should be changed to "Digium" to be more clear about the
>> current state of affairs.
> There are several people now that I would consider to be maintainers  
> who
> are not employees of Digium, and some others who are working towards
> that goal.  Much of the development is done by mutual assent.  We  
> all get
> along to some degree or another, or else it wouldn't be much of a  
> community.

I agree, but there's no definition of "maintainers" anywhere for this
project and we propably need to define that more formally if
we're going to have that word in this document.


More information about the asterisk-dev mailing list