[asterisk-dev] [policy] Bug Tracker Workflow Discussion

[Johansson Olle E]

10 jul 2008 kl. 19.22 skrev Tilghman Lesher:

> On Thursday 10 July 2008 11:05:30 Johansson Olle E wrote:
>> 10 jul 2008 kl. 16.40 skrev Leif Madsen:
>>> Performance issues will only be considered for the
>>> release branch if they are considered significant, and should be
>>> approved by the maintainers.
>>>
>>> If there is ever a question about what should be included in the
>>> release
>>> branch, the maintainers should be allowed to make the decision.
>>
>> What's the election procedure of the "maintainers" ?
>>
>> Maybe this should be changed to "Digium" to be more clear about the
>> current state of affairs.
>
> There are several people now that I would consider to be maintainers  
> who
> are not employees of Digium, and some others who are working towards
> that goal.  Much of the development is done by mutual assent.  We  
> all get
> along to some degree or another, or else it wouldn't be much of a  
> community.

I agree, but there's no definition of "maintainers" anywhere for this
project and we propably need to define that more formally if
we're going to have that word in this document.

/O