[asterisk-dev] new priority of pattern matching in 1.4. Does itmakes sense?

[Matthew Nicholson]

On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 11:03 -0500, Jared Smith wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 10:52 +0100, Andreas Sikkema wrote:
> > What are the rules regarding "t" extensions? Can any context contain "t"
> > extensions? 
> 
> Yes, any context can contain a 't' extension.
> 
> > Which one will be matched, the one in the same context as
> > the last matched extension?
> 
> The 't' extension in the same context from which Background() or
> WaitExten() were called.

't' will also match in any included contexts just like normal extension
matching.

-- 
Matthew Nicholson
Digium