[asterisk-dev] new priority of pattern matching in 1.4. Does it makes sense?

[Matthew Nicholson]

On Fri, 2008-02-22 at 10:31 -0600, John Lange wrote:
> 
> [...]
> 
> My point is simply that this example doesn't work with the existing
> system. "convert-to-local" never matches because "long-distance" is
> always a higher priority.
> 

I didn't test this, but my gut tells me [convert-to-local] would match
before long-distance (asterisk would search in [local] then in
[convert-to-local] before moving on).  Also you would need to include
the [no-sex] context first for it to be effective, other wise 900
numbers would match in [longdistance].

-- 
Matthew Nicholson
Digium