[asterisk-dev] AST_FRAME_DIGITAL

[Kevin P. Fleming]

Matthew Fredrickson wrote:

> I can see their point though.  Why do it when you don't have to.  I 
> think my propsed AST_FORMAT_DIGITAL with different subclasses that can 
> be transcoded using an extension to the translation core would solve all 
> of these issues.

While I think this is a good plan as well, I don't think the T.38
example is actually accurate, because I don't think you can transcode
T.38 to analog modem signals on a frame-by-frame basis.

-- 
Kevin P. Fleming
Director of Software Technologies
Digium, Inc. - "The Genuine Asterisk Experience" (TM)